<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>saveaccess&#039;s blog</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/blog/2</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>More disturbing numbers for telcos</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2320</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://telephonyonline.com/broadband/news/disturbing-numbers-telcos-0513/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Telephony Online&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More disturbing numbers for telcos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May 13, 2008 11:02 AM, By Carol Wilson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two separate sources this week are offering up more analysis showing the telcos are falling behind the cable companies in the broadband and video battle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Information Gatekeepers, an analyst firm that once predicted the telcos would overtake cable in broadband penetration, this week issued its High-Speed Access Report for the first quarter of 2008, showing cable is outperforming its forecast and the telcos are under-performing what IGI had forecast in 2006. The latest report is in keeping with what IGI began saying in 2007, when it warned that both AT&amp;amp;T and Verizon were falling behind in implementing high-speed access plans, and thus their data revenues would not make up for lost wireline access income.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/8">Bell South</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/11">Qwest</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:55:58 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Local governments withhold public access TV funds</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2319</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orangepolitics.org/2008/05/local-governments-withhold-public-access-tv-funds&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Orange Politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Local governments withhold public access TV funds&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by Ruby Sinreich on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 11:50am.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems like Chapel Hill and Orange County are giving our local public access provider quite the run around, when they should be giving them money! The programming on The Peoples Channel includes a wide variety of creative output and civic endeavors by local residents, plus they also carry the essential Democracy Now! If you don&#039;t find what you want on channel 8, you can march right in to the station, get low-cost training, and fill that gap. This nonprofit TV station is a tremendous asset to our community, and it deserves to be fully funded by our local governments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:50:42 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IN: Public access TV suffering from telecom ‘reform&#039; bill</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2318</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalgazette.net/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080515/EDIT05/805150380&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Journal Gazette&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Published: May 15, 2008 6:00 a.m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Public access TV suffering from telecom ‘reform&#039; bill&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Erik S. Möllberg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Advertisement&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those of us in the Public, Educational and Government Access TV community believed that House Bill 1279 (transferring cable franchising from municipalities to state control) would not only fail to address concerns we had prior to its passage, but also would cause irreparable harm to every PEG access center in Indiana. State legislators assured us this would not happen. Now, two years after the bill’s passage, those trepidations have materialized.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/25">INDIANA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:47:47 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: As AT$T legislation wraps up, city may be first to see U-verse</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2317</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/news.php?viewStory=59939&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The City Paper&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;As AT&amp;amp;T legislation wraps up, city may be first to see U-verse&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By John Rodgers, Friday, May 2, 2008 3:21 am&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nashvillians and residents of neighboring counties will likely have the first crack at AT&amp;amp;T’s television programming later this year now that legislation is close to becoming law, a lawmaker close to the telecom said.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:15:59 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Be the Media -- Free Speech Unfurled</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2316</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nten.org/blog/2008/04/22/be-the-media-free-speech-unfurled&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; NTEN.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Be the Media -- Free Speech Unfurled&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Increase text size Decrease text size   Email this page Print this page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nonprofit Technology Network, April 22, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Lauren-Glenn Davitian&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While mainstream media remains under the control of a handful of giant corporations, you no longer have to own a printing press to reach a dedicated audience. Gone are the days when we chose from one of three national nightly newscasts on the living room TV. Free speech, broadband services and mobile handsets are quickly dismantling the “one to many” Broadcast Age and putting media production and distribution directly into the hands of “the people”.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:16:43 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: The Cancellation of Channel 36</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-oe-morrison1-2008may01,1,3119514.column&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;La Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Cancellation of Channel 36&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Increase text size Decrease text size   Email this page Print this page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Los Angeles Times, May 1, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Patt Morrison&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s the channel you probably channel-surf right past on your way from Discovery to CNN.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:15:09 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Statewide Cable Franchise Bill Passes General Assembly</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2314</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://wpln.org/newstranscripts/?p=2261&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Nashville Public radio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Statewide Cable Franchise Bill Passes General Assembly&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thursday, May 01st, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A bill that would allow AT&amp;amp;T to expand into cable and broadband internet services statewide is on its way to the governor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Senate unanimously passed the measure today, after two years of behind-the-scenes bargaining between the giant phone utility and the cable television industry. Senate Speaker Ron Ramsey says he’s satisfied with the end result.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:11:57 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Historic’ AT$T bill headed to governor</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2313</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/news.php?viewStory=59909&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The City Paper&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Historic’ AT&amp;amp;T bill headed to governor&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By John Rodgers, jrodgers@nashvillecitypaper.com&lt;br /&gt;
Updated: Thursday, May 1, 2008 10:33 am&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calling it a “historic day in Tennessee,” the Senate unanimously approved a bill this morning paving the way for AT&amp;amp;T to start offering television programming in Tennessee and compete with the cable industry.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:07:09 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Nashville: House approves AT$T cable deal</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2312</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://timesfreepress.com/news/2008/apr/29/nashiville-house-approves-t-cable-deal/?local&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Times Free Press&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, April 29, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Nashville: House approves AT&amp;amp;T cable deal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By: Andy Sher&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASHVILLE — The House voted 93-2 Monday for legislation that would let AT&amp;amp;T begin competing with cable companies to provide television services across Tennessee.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:18:20 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Cable bill passes House</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2311</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wreg.com/Global/story.asp?S=8239973&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; AP Wire&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cable bill passes House&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Associated Press - April 28, 2008 6:35 PM ET&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) - A proposal to provide statewide cable TV franchising has passed the House.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legislation approved 93-2 on Monday would allow companies like AT&amp;amp;T Inc. to avoid having to seek hundreds of municipal permits to offer TV service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:14:23 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: AT$T still not definite on U-verse here</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2310</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/business/283540&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Capital Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AT&amp;amp;T still not definite on U-verse here&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff Richgels  —  4/28/2008 11:26 am&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is looking to hire 200 more technicians to install and service its U-verse TV service, which now is available to more than 200,000 homes in the Milwaukee, Racine and Sheboygan areas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even though the jobs include positions in south central Wisconsin, indicating that U-verse may be offered here in the near future, the company still isn&#039;t saying when the Madison area might get U-verse.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:12:30 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NY: Verizon TV proposal needs tuning</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2309</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/04/25/2008-04-25_verizon_tv_proposal_needs_tuning.html&quot; target=blank&quot;&gt; NY Daily News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon TV proposal needs tuning&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friday, April 25th 2008, 4:00 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Telecom giant Verizon has finally submitted its long-awaited proposal for a competing cable television franchise for New York City.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you live in the Bronx, Brooklyn or Queens and you&#039;re eager to ditch Time Warner or Cablevision, take a number.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:44:31 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>OH: State video franchising: Where are the competitors?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2308</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.callahansclevelanddiary.com/?p=559&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Callahan&#039;s Diary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;State video franchising: Where are the competitors?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/04/19/a-raw-deal-from-att/&quot;&gt;This post and comments at BFD&lt;/a&gt; got me wondering: How&amp;#8217;s that brave new world of competitive IPTV and sizzling broadband that Ohioans were promised last summer &amp;#8212; when the General Assembly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.callahansclevelanddiary.com/?p=267&quot;&gt;overwhelmingly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.callahansclevelanddiary.com/?p=286&quot;&gt;approved&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governor.ohio.gov/Default.aspx?tabid=723&quot;&gt;the Governor happily signed&lt;/a&gt; SB 117, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.callahansclevelanddiary.com/?p=285&quot;&gt;AT&amp;#038;T&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;cable franchise reform&amp;#8221; bill&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8212; coming along?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/33">OHIO</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Final Language of the Tennessee Franchise Reform Bill and Amendments</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2307</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: Elliott Mitchell&lt;br /&gt;
Music City Arts TV9 / iQ TV10&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.meac.tv&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Attached, please find the final language of the Franchise &quot;Reform&quot; Legislation in the General Assembly in Tennessee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There has been some criticism of the draft version of this legislation, and insofar as I can tell the final version is identical to the draft.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will be the first to tell you that the bill is imperfect, but I also know some of its genesis and was privileged to be among the PEG folks asked to help the Tennessee Municipal League understand and object to many of the demands of both Telco and Cable during closed-door &quot;negotiation.&quot;  I believe I can report that due to TML&#039;s help, PEG in Tennessee dodged several major bullets, where other states have been not so fortunate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <enclosure url="http://saveaccess.org/sites/saveaccess.org/files/HA1245.pdf" length="248408" type="application/binary" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:49:35 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TX: Book Report Raises Questions About Texas’ SB5</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2306</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggingbroadband.com/?p=132&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;Blogging Broadband&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Book Report Raises Questions About Texas’ SB5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those keeping score know that the Texas legislature really started the state-mandated video franchise train down the tracks.  SB5 was passed in Texas at the end of 2005.  It was a natural place for the phone companies to get the ball rolling, as SBC, now the new AT&amp;amp;T, called Texas home.  Since SB5 passed, a likely-unprecedented wave of states adopted some form of “shall issue” video franchising — all of it aimed at helping the phone companies get into the cable business.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/37">TEXAS</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:46:31 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
