FCC Video Franchise
Posted on January 29, 2008 - 8:27am.
from: MultiChannel News
The Winds of Change
Potential Reform of FCC Could Go in Many Directions
by Ted Hearn -- Multichannel News, 1/28/2008
The House Energy and Commerce Committee is shining a spotlight on FCC chairman Kevin Martin’s management of the agency. (See “Watching the Martin Watch,” page 18, Jan. 21, 2008).
Posted on January 2, 2008 - 2:30pm.
Note: Thorough background from Miller Van Eaton on the recent FCC rulings effecting PEG
from: Miller Van Eaton
LOCAL COMMUNITIES PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE FCC'S SECOND CABLE FRANCHISING ORDER
Posted on December 21, 2007 - 3:40pm.
from: Broadcasting and Cable
Local Groups Petition FCC to Stay Ruling on Video-Franchise Reform
"Groups say FCC decision will "severely restrict the ability of local governments to protect their citizens, rights-of-way, community channels, and public safety networks."
Posted on November 26, 2007 - 9:48pm.
Lincoln's Legislative blog
Monday, November 26, 2007
UPDATE: The FCC’s Second Report and Order on Cable Franchising
On October 31, 2007, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a Second Report and Order in MB Docket No. 05-311, FCC 07-190, released November 6, 2007, that addressed whether findings and relief for new entrants, promulgated in the Docket’s First Report and Order, also known as the Section 621 Report and Order, should be extended to current cable service providers (“incumbents”). The FCC found the following:
Posted on November 26, 2007 - 9:28pm.
from: NY Times
November 26, 2007
F.C.C. Chief Seeks Votes to Tighten Cable Rules
By STEPHEN LABATON
WASHINGTON, Nov. 25 — The head of the Federal Communications Commission is struggling to find enough support from a majority of the agency's commissioners to regulate cable television companies more tightly.
Posted on November 26, 2007 - 9:08pm.
from: TechDirt
AT&T: Deregulation Only Applies To Us
from the hypocrites dept
AT&T has spent a lot of money in the last few years lobbying against government regulation. They pushed hard to dismantle the Clinton-era DSL unbundling rules. They've lobbied against having to negotiate thousands of franchise agreements with municipalities around the country before they could offer TV service. And, of course, they've lobbied hard against network neutrality regulations. In all cases, their argument was the same: market forces can protect consumers better than FCC meddling. And I've often been sympathetic to those arguments in cases where they've faced real competition. However, James Gattuso points out that for all their bluster about free markets, AT&T only favors deregulation for themselves. In a recent letter to the FCC, AT&T threw its weight behind FCC chairman Kevin Martin's proposal to impose new regulations on the cable industry under an obscure provision of the 1984 Cable Communications Policy Act. It's awfully hard to take AT&T's position here seriously. If, as they've been arguing for the last three years, the cable market is competitive enough that the franchise system should be liberalized, then it's certainly competitive enough not to need new regulations. Conversely, if new regulations of the cable industry are needed, why should AT&T be excused from complying with the rules the same rules as the cable industry? As James points out, these kinds of flip-flops completely undermine AT&T's credibility, and are likely to hurt them in the long run. If they leap at every opportunity to impose new regulations on their competitors, who's going to take them seriously when they advocate deregulation for themselves?
Posted on November 17, 2007 - 11:18am.
from: Peoria Chronicle
New FCC rule could mean less franchise fee revenue for Peoria
I’ve been trying to keep up on how cable franchise negotiations are going. You may recall that the city’s franchise agreement with Insight expired in April 2006. After several months, the city finally signed a temporary extension with Insight/Comcast through January 1, 2008. That’s not very far away now, and there’s still no permanent franchise agreement.
Posted on November 3, 2007 - 10:32am.
from: VCAM Blog
Threats to public access?
On October 31st, the FCC made some decisions concerning media ownership and franchising rules that could adversely affect public, educational and government access centers nationwide. It’s one more push towards a cliff that PEG centers have been inching closer to over the last several years. Basically, the FCC is attempting to remove rules that permit local franchising authorities (in this case, the Vermont Public Service Board) from requiring cable companies to set aside funds for PEG services.
Posted on November 3, 2007 - 10:30am.
from: Toward Freedom
I Want My Community TV: Public Access Television Faces Threats
Written by Megan Tady
Tuesday, 30 October 2007
Imagine you know a thief is going to pilfer your television in the middle of the night? Most likely, you would take action to stop it – lock your doors, hide your TV, or in one last ditch effort for revenge, at least hide your remote. Imagine you knew that in the broadest of daylight, corporations and government were going to pinch not your television, but the only TV channels that give you, the citizen, a voice and a hand in local programming? Well grab your bat, because there’s someone at your door.
Posted on November 3, 2007 - 10:24am.
from: USa Today
FCC Bans Exclusive Cable Deals at Apartment Complexes
November 1, 2007
By David Lieberman
Trying to promote pay-TV competition and keep prices in check, the Federal Communications Commission voted unanimously Wednesday to wipe out deals giving cable operators exclusive access to apartments, condos and other centrally managed real estate developments.
|
|
