LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAXES
A Response to Industry’s 2004 COST Study

Read complete NATOA PDF here [1]

The telecommunications industry is conducting a multipronged effort to reduce the level of taxes it pays to local governments. Large sums of money are being poured into national and local advertising in a highly targeted media and lobbying campaign. In addition, the telecommunications industry is litigating against local governments to contest taxes and fees. The industry is also lobbying the federal and state governments to obtain favorable legislation to accomplish the same result.

As with any business, telecommunications companies need to pay their fair share of taxes. Recognizing the convergence among different types of telecommunications services, local governments generally favor the imposition of taxes on a nondiscriminatory basis, regardless of the technologies used, on competing communications service providers that offer functionally equivalent services. They also favor reforms that will create a level playing field for competition among existing and new service providers. Further, they favor simplifying the administration of state and local taxes on communications services to encourage continued investments and innovations.

In this context, it is critical that industry viewpoints be carefully scrutinized. The industry commissioned a study, published in March 2005 by the Telecommunications Tax Task Force of the Council on State Taxation (COST), titled 2004 State Study and Report on Telecommunications Taxation (the COST Study)
more . . . [2]