<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - Verizon</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>NYC: Verizon Cable Franchise Agreement</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2329</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dmiblog.com/archives/2008/06/verizon_cable_franchise_agreem.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; DMI Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon Cable Franchise Agreement: $70 Billion Bun That Needs More Time in the Oven&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Keeley&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New York City’s cable marketplace is currently divided into territories, with some of the city controlled by Time Warner and other portions by Cablevision. New York City and Verizon recently reached a 12-year, first-of-its-kind cable franchise agreement which will allow Verizon to offer the “triple play” of services – cable TV, phone and internet service – throughout all five boroughs of the city. With this agreement, New York City is calling off a long-held, city-imposed truce between the city’s two cable providers, Time Warner and Cablevision, and other competitors.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:42:41 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NY: Public Hearing on proposed Verizon cable TV franchise tomorrow</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2324</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://breitbart.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/public-hearing-on-proposed-verizon-cable-tv-franchise-tomorrow/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Civil Defense&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Public Hearing on proposed Verizon cable TV franchise tomorrow&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&#039;snap_preview&#039;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The City and Verizon have negotiated a deal that will have a greater impact on our television watching and Internet usage than any other action the City or a company will take in the next 20 years – and you have been shut out of the discussion. The 6-billion-dollar deal (&lt;a href=&quot;http://breitbart.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/verizon-fios-proposes-citywide-buildout/&quot;&gt;see my earlier post for background&lt;/a&gt;) to build a fiber optic network throughout the entire city was negotiated behind closed doors.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 06:54:58 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NYC: Consumer Groups Want Verizon Franchise Delay</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2321</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crainsnewyork.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080520/FREE/821207367/1065/toc&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Crain&#039;s New York&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Consumer Groups Want Verizon Franchise Delay&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Crain&#039;s New York Business, May 20, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Amanda Fung&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consumer advocate groups Common Cause New York and People’s Production House, as well as some City Council members, say Verizon&#039;s deal with the city merits further scrutiny.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 06:45:34 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More disturbing numbers for telcos</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2320</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://telephonyonline.com/broadband/news/disturbing-numbers-telcos-0513/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Telephony Online&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More disturbing numbers for telcos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May 13, 2008 11:02 AM, By Carol Wilson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two separate sources this week are offering up more analysis showing the telcos are falling behind the cable companies in the broadband and video battle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Information Gatekeepers, an analyst firm that once predicted the telcos would overtake cable in broadband penetration, this week issued its High-Speed Access Report for the first quarter of 2008, showing cable is outperforming its forecast and the telcos are under-performing what IGI had forecast in 2006. The latest report is in keeping with what IGI began saying in 2007, when it warned that both AT&amp;amp;T and Verizon were falling behind in implementing high-speed access plans, and thus their data revenues would not make up for lost wireline access income.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/8">Bell South</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/11">Qwest</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:55:58 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NY: Verizon TV proposal needs tuning</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2309</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/04/25/2008-04-25_verizon_tv_proposal_needs_tuning.html&quot; target=blank&quot;&gt; NY Daily News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon TV proposal needs tuning&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friday, April 25th 2008, 4:00 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Telecom giant Verizon has finally submitted its long-awaited proposal for a competing cable television franchise for New York City.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you live in the Bronx, Brooklyn or Queens and you&#039;re eager to ditch Time Warner or Cablevision, take a number.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:44:31 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TX: Book Report Raises Questions About Texas’ SB5</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2306</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggingbroadband.com/?p=132&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;Blogging Broadband&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Book Report Raises Questions About Texas’ SB5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those keeping score know that the Texas legislature really started the state-mandated video franchise train down the tracks.  SB5 was passed in Texas at the end of 2005.  It was a natural place for the phone companies to get the ball rolling, as SBC, now the new AT&amp;amp;T, called Texas home.  Since SB5 passed, a likely-unprecedented wave of states adopted some form of “shall issue” video franchising — all of it aimed at helping the phone companies get into the cable business.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/37">TEXAS</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:46:31 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NY: Lobbying Albany: A Recession-Proof Industry</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2301</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2008/04/lobbying_albany.php&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Village Voice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lobbying Albany: A Recession-Proof Industry&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posted by Duncan Meisel at 4:25 PM, April 17, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wall Street may be taking a beating recently, but at least one other New York industry seems recession-proof: lobbying. Once again, spending on lobbying broke records, with an all-time high of $171.2 million spent on influencing state lawmakers, according to the Commission on Public Integrity which released its annual report on lobbying of the New York State legislature.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:54:27 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon Sues Time Warner Cable Over Ads</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2297</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6549743.html?nid=2734&amp;amp;rid=692228864&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon Sues Time Warner Cable Over Ads&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Telco Alleges Cabler Makes False Claims About FiOS Service&lt;br /&gt;
By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 4/9/2008 10:21:00 PM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verizon Communications filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday against Time Warner Cable, alleging the cable operator’s TV ads make “blatantly false” statements about its FiOS services in an attempt to dissuade customers from switching.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:43:54 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NYC: Verizon files to break cable monopolies</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2294</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crainsnewyork.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080415/FREE/730136573/1065&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Cranes New York&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon files to break cable monopolies&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The telecommunications giant submitted a proposal that would make it the first company to offer cable TV service throughout New York City.&lt;br /&gt;
April 15. 2008 5:59PMBy:  Amanda Fung&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verizon Communications Inc. would be the first company to offer cable TV service throughout all of New York City under a plan filed with city officials Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:37:04 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Nice Lobby</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2291</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=150810&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Light Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nice Lobby&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
APRIL 10, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
Discuss &gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1:00 PM -- There&#039;s one industry in the U.S. economy that is certainly not in a recession: lobbying. In New York state alone, lobbyists had a golden year in 2007, taking in a record $172.1 million. There are a lot of people and companies to thank for that, but none more so than Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ - message board).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:04:40 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NY: FiOS Internet Takes Manhattan</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2274</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6544157.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FiOS Internet Takes Manhattan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Telco Offers High-Speed To Pair of Apartment Complexes; Sill Lacks Video Franchise&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 3/24/2008 8:31:00 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verizon Communications has inked a deal to Internet service at up to 50 megabits per second, over its FiOS fiber-optic network, to residents in two Manhattan apartment complexes – but for now, the telco&#039;s still unable to proffer TV services in New York City.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:16:29 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MA: Verizon under fire for FiOS</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2271</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.thesunchronicle.com/articles/2008/03/25/news/doc47e8742e6a615793107008.txt&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Sun Chronicle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon under fire for FiOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
BY TED NESI / SUN CHRONICLE STAFF&lt;br /&gt;
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:05 AM EDT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verizon has been under fire in recent months from critics who question why the company’s rollout of FiOS, its new fiber-optic cable television and Internet service, has mostly ignored Massachusetts’ cities, including Attleboro, Boston and Brockton, in favor of suburbs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/26">MASSACHUSETTS</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:07:17 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon to New England: Bye-Bye</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2259</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://blogs.computerworld.com/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Computer World&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon to New England: Bye-Bye&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Increase text size Decrease text size   Email this page Print this page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;March 12, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Robert L. Mitchell&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It looks like the Verizon selloff of its Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont landline business to FairPoint Communications is a done deal. All three states have given their approval, with conditions. That deal will have a huge impact on the evolution of high speed broadband in Northern New England.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:11:49 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon Gets Cozy With P2P File Sharers</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2249</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-P2P-Verizon.html?_r=2&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; NY Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon Gets Cozy With P2P File - Sharers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS&lt;br /&gt;
Published: March 14, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Filed at 2:09 p.m. ET&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NEW YORK (AP) -- Peer-to-peer file sharing, the primary vehicle for online piracy, has been as unpopular with Internet service providers as it has been popular with users.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MA: Paying a bundle for cable upgrade</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2212</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: Unlike AT&amp;amp;T, Verizon doesn&#039;t demand public interest concessions via state video franchises before upgrading their network, in fact Verizon seems to have had no problem negotiating hundreds of local franchises in MA, PA and NY. Perhaps AT&amp;amp;T should attend a communications seminar at Verizon?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/02/29/paying_a_bundle_for_cable_upgrade/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Boston.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/26">MASSACHUSETTS</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:04:13 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
