<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - Telcos</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Lawmakers Press FCC On AT$T&#039;s Public Program Offerings</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2338</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.morningstar.com/newsnet/printNews.aspx?article=/DJ/200809171410DOWJONESDJONLINE000870_univ.xml&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Morning Star&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Lawmakers Press FCC On AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s Public Program Offerings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
9-17-08 2:10 PM EDT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Members of a powerful House committee are pressing the Federal Communications Commission to put a stop to how AT&amp;amp;T Inc. (T) offers public and educational programming on its fledgling paid TV service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/17">FCC Video Franchise</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:59:17 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Verminators!</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2337</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.riedelcommunications.blogspot.com/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Riedel Communications&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More Verminators!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the eve of a Congressional hearing regarding what has happened to Public, Educational and Government (PEG) access channels since the passage of statewide or state issued franchise legislation, it is heartening to note that the cable and telecom industries (and the FCC) have severely overplayed their hand. Tomorrow, the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government will hear a laundry list of harms done to PEG in what appears to be an industry-wide effort to bury and destroy these local channels. An effort that was spawned by the FCC’s First and Second Report and Order on Video Franchising and the nineteen states that passed the state legislation. These harms come at a time when Congress and the American people are acutely sensitive to media consolidation and the loss of localism.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/17">FCC Video Franchise</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:56:27 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More disturbing numbers for telcos</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2320</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://telephonyonline.com/broadband/news/disturbing-numbers-telcos-0513/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Telephony Online&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More disturbing numbers for telcos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May 13, 2008 11:02 AM, By Carol Wilson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two separate sources this week are offering up more analysis showing the telcos are falling behind the cable companies in the broadband and video battle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Information Gatekeepers, an analyst firm that once predicted the telcos would overtake cable in broadband penetration, this week issued its High-Speed Access Report for the first quarter of 2008, showing cable is outperforming its forecast and the telcos are under-performing what IGI had forecast in 2006. The latest report is in keeping with what IGI began saying in 2007, when it warned that both AT&amp;amp;T and Verizon were falling behind in implementing high-speed access plans, and thus their data revenues would not make up for lost wireline access income.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/8">Bell South</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/11">Qwest</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:55:58 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Were Telcos Justified in Warrantless Wiretaps?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2251</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=148374&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Light Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Were Telcos Justified in Warrantless Wiretaps?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
MARCH 14, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Democrats and Republicans in Congress are divided over a critical telecom issue: wiretapping. Are the U.S.&#039;s largest phone companies liable for assisting the federal government in carrying out warrantless wiretaps?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/50">NSA/Telco Wiretap Scandal</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:44:53 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Telecom Companies Try to Buy Their Way Out of Trouble</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2239</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_8486550?nclick_check=1&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; San Jose Mercury News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Telecom Companies Try to Buy Their Way Out of Trouble&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;March 7, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Robert Jacobson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California’s biggest telephone companies are throwing their political weight around again. But this time the issue isn’t about yet more rate increases or competing with cable TV. It’s spying.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/50">NSA/Telco Wiretap Scandal</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:09:26 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>GOP To Telecoms: Give Us Cash For Advocating Wiretaps</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2208</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/28/gop-to-telecoms-give-us-_n_88885.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GOP To Telecoms: Give Us Cash For Advocating Wiretaps&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Roll Call/WaPo   |   February 28, 2008 10:10 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    With the House Democrats&#039; refusal to grant retroactive immunity to phone companies -- stalling the rewrite of the warrantless wiretapping program -- GOP leadership aides are grumbling that their party isn&#039;t getting more political money from the telecommunications industry.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/50">NSA/Telco Wiretap Scandal</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:32:54 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Comcast Paying Folks to Attend FCC Hearing Is Wrong.</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2202</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: We hear it&#039;s common practice for corporations and lobbyists to hire line waiters and seat warmers for Congressional hearings too - this is why you only see suits in the front rows of major hearings. Apparently democracy has a price . . .&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/1087&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Wet Machine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;For the Clueless Among Us: Why Comcast Paying Folks to Attend FCC Hearing Is Wrong. I can&#039;t believe I actually need to explain this.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:55:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCC En Banc: Annals of the Battle for the Last Mile</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2201</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://fredjohnson.mwg.org/?p=65&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Media - Space - Place - Network&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FCC En Banc: Annals of the Battle for the Last Mile&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
February 26th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
Fred Johnson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Harvard Law School was “Markey Country” today as Massachusetts Congressman Ed Markey defended net neutrality in his opening remarks before the FCC’s Public En Banc Hearing on broadband network management practices in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Markey declared the US “no country for old bandwidth” and hung around to observe, with the rest of us, the FCC, “en banc” and securely enclosed in Harvard space droning through a tedious day of testimony and q&amp;amp;a, comfortably surrounded by an audience packed with polite but bored Comcast employees trained to provide applause on cue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:28:10 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cable and telcos side with Comcast in FCC BitTorrent dispute</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2186</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080219-cable-and-telcos-side-with-comcast-in-fcc-bittorrent-dispute.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cable and telcos side with Comcast in FCC BitTorrent dispute&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Matthew Lasar | Published: February 19, 2008 - 04:57AM CT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The race is on to get the last word in on the Comcast/BitTorrent controversy. With ten days left to file, telcos, trade, and advocacy groups are sending the Federal Communications Commission their statements on whether Comcast and other ISPs purposefully degrade peer to peer traffic, and if so, what to do about it. Not surprisingly, the debate pits broadband content providers and advocacy groups against the big telcos, cable companies, and their trade association backers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Connected Nation&#039;s $134 Billion Fish Tale?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2185</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Connected-Nations-134-Billion-Fish-Tale-92074&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Connected Nation&#039;s $134 Billion Fish Tale?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;Editorial: Lets make sure we adopt the RIGHT national broadband policy....&lt;br&gt;12:00PM Friday Feb 22 2008 by Karl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last month Public Knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/90901&quot;&gt;penned a piece&lt;/a&gt; that suggested that Connected Nation, a group supposedly created to push a national broadband policy, was actually now essentially a baby bell lobbying effort. The allegation was that what started as a real, local Kentucky effort to map U&amp;#46S&amp;#46 broadband penetration, has ultimately been hijacked by baby bell lobbyists, and now exists primarily as a way to protect those companies&#039; interests under the guise of a national broadband deployment model. If true, it&#039;s absolutely ingenious in a robustly amoral way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:18:45 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cable Prepares an Answer to FiOS</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2177</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120295689385867313.html?mod=telecommunications_primary_hs&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cable Prepares an Answer to FiOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From Wall Street Journal, February 14, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Vishesh Kumar&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stung by the success of phone companies in selling packages of TV and high-speed Internet services, the cable industry is getting close to launching a counteroffensive — an inexpensive new technology that dramatically boosts Internet connection speeds.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:09:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Analog is Dead. Long Live Analog</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2171</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; A very useful article for sorting out all the broadcast digital transition (DTV) misinformation in the media these days. It also highlights cable company strategies for playing the transition to their own end (the cable digital transition deadline isn&#039;t until Feb 2012). Lost here is any mention of affordable &#039;basic&#039; cable service, the tier of analog service consisting of local broadcast and PEG channels priced to ensure that low-income and fixed income families can afford basic local TV service. We need to ensure that digital cable affords this tier of service for those that need it most.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6533127.html?nid=4262&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Analog is Dead. Long Live Analog&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why Cable Won’t Go All-Digital By Feb. 18, 2009, Even If Broadcasters Will&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 2/18/2008 8:22:00 AM&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is analog TV an albatross for cable?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/51">DTV Transition</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:54:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Study: US broadband goal nearly reached</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2135</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: Yet another example of the Bush administration &#039;inventing reality&#039; based on their own political exigencies, despite the fact that numerous studies and the daily experience of most Americans suggest a much different &#039;broadband&#039; state of affairs.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080130/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/broadband_access&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; AP/Yahoo News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study: US broadband goal nearly reached&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:47:11 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Potential Reform of FCC Could Go in Many Directions</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2115</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6525874.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Winds of Change&lt;br /&gt;
Potential Reform of FCC Could Go in Many Directions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by Ted Hearn -- Multichannel News, 1/28/2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The House Energy and Commerce Committee is shining a spotlight on FCC chairman Kevin Martin’s management of the agency. (See “Watching the Martin Watch,” page 18, Jan. 21, 2008).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/16">FCC Media Ownership</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/17">FCC Video Franchise</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:27:13 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Above the Law: AT$T, Verizon, BellSouth, and the Executive Branch</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://pmo.vox.com/library/post/above-the-law-att-verizon-bellsouth-and-the-executive-branch.html?_c=feed-atom&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Vox.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Above the Law: AT&amp;amp;T, Verizon, BellSouth, and the Executive Branch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jan 26, 2008 at 3:29 PM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Bush Administration has been pushing hard for the Congress to grant retroactive immunity to telecom companies that cooperated with its domestic wiretapping program, the legality of which is still in question. For most Americans, this story falls in the category of boring, but important. Most aren&#039;t even aware that we&#039;re facing a Constitutional question that could fundamentally change the way we govern ourselves, and how we hold each other accountable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/50">NSA/Telco Wiretap Scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:11:51 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
