<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - CALIFORNIA</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>CA: The Cancellation of Channel 36</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-oe-morrison1-2008may01,1,3119514.column&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;La Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Cancellation of Channel 36&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Increase text size Decrease text size   Email this page Print this page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Los Angeles Times, May 1, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Patt Morrison&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s the channel you probably channel-surf right past on your way from Discovery to CNN.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:15:09 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: AT$T’s TV Plans Don’t Click in California</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2178</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paloaltoonline.com/weekly/story.php?story_id=7708&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Palo Alto Online&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;syrong&gt;AT&amp;amp;T’s TV Plans Don’t Click in California&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;February 13, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Becky Trout&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Within months, AT&amp;amp;T Inc. plans to begin offering television service in Palo Alto over phone lines, introducing a new format for local programming that has the cable experts at the Midpeninsula Community Media Center and City of Palo Alto concerned.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:17:15 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: ED Annie Folger Preserving Public Access in Washington DC</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2170</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://midpen-media-center.blogspot.com/2008/02/ed-annie-folger-preserving-public.html&quot; taget=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Midpeninsula Community Media Center&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;See source above for video links&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friday, February 8, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;ED Annie Folger Preserving Public Access in Washington DC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Media Center&#039;s Executive Director, Annie Folger, recently flew out to Washington DC to speak in front of Congress, representing the Alliance for Community Media. She was fighting for Comcast and AT&amp;amp;T to continue to providing PEG (Public, Educational and Government) services as they currently are (or better) and to abide by local, state, and federal laws.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:56:07 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: Broadcasting a warning for television</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2145</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paloaltodailynews.com/article/2008-2-1-pa-cable&quot; taget=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Palo Alto Daily News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Broadcasting a warning for television&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Friday Feb 1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Media advocate: Public programming needs to be protected&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Kristina Peterson / Daily News Staff Writer&lt;br /&gt;
Congress got a taste of Palo Alto&#039;s civic engagement this week when a local media coordinator flew across the country to testify about the importance of preserving public access programming.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:29:41 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: Time Warner wants to get off the hook with Moorpark</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2142</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: Another case of rising &#039;basic cable&#039; rates a a result of state franchises. Once local oversight is lifted by the FCC, cable and phone companies have raised the &#039;basic cable&#039; rate by as much as 200%.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.moorparkacorn.com/news/2008/0201/community/014.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Moorpark Acorn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Time Warner wants to get off the hook with Moorpark&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:40:12 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: Ojai&#039;s Public Access May Be Closed</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2098</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://ojaivalleynews.blogspot.com/2008/01/ojais-public-access-may-be-closed.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Ojai Valley News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thursday, January 24, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Ojai&#039;s Public Access May Be Closed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Time Warner inks deal with state, it will likely be curtains for local television shows&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Nao Braverman&lt;br /&gt;
Public access television stations, known to feature quirky television shows with all the amateur charm of low-budget production and editing, may be heading for demise in California, and even sooner in Ojai.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:32:52 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: AT$T Says Attack Misinformed</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2095</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: The &#039;attacks&#039; in question were hardly misinformed - only AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s response can be considered misinformation. AT&amp;amp;T places regional PEG channels on a Channel 99 submenu on their U-verse system - a submenu list that could grow to over a hundred becoming increasingly unwieldy and useless. This is a side-effect of telco/cable providers moving to a regional head-end, eliminating local head-in systems for cost efficiencies (think Clear Channel and the loss of localism).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:49:57 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: Santa Clarita has a year to figure out a way to save public channel</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2094</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-signal.com/?module=displaystory&amp;amp;story_id=52839&amp;amp;format=html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Signal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;City Eyeing Public Access TV Options&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Santa Clarita has a year to figure out a way to save public channel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Katherine Geyer&lt;br /&gt;
Signal Staff Writer&lt;br /&gt;
Monday January 21, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The city of Santa Clarita will spend the next year figuring out how to continue providing programming on its public access channel thanks to a 2006 state law that relieves cable companies of the responsibility of operating a public access studio beginning in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:23:40 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: Operators Opt For Calif. Oversight</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2091</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6524127.html?rssid=196&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Operators Opt For Calif. Oversight&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cable Companies Take Advantage Of State Law Replacing Local Franchise Terms&lt;br /&gt;
By Linda Haugsted -- Multichannel News, 1/21/2008 5:30:00 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Operators big and small have taken advantage of California law allowing operators to replace local franchise terms with state oversight.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:07:02 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Costa Mesa officials try to block AT$T &#039;eyesore&#039;</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2038</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocregister.com/news/boxes-service-officials-1957952-very-naghavi&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; OC Register&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friday, January 11, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Costa Mesa officials try to block &#039;eyesore&#039;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
AT&amp;amp;T wants to put scores of metal boxes on city streets, raising concerns about aesthetics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By JEFF OVERLEY&lt;br /&gt;
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER&lt;br /&gt;
Comments 1 | Recommend 7&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COSTA MESA – Plans to add scores of steel boxes to city streets for Internet access and television service are riling elected officials who are concerned about damage to neighborhood aesthetics.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:33:59 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: Access is difficult on AT$T cable</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1974</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paloaltodailynews.com/article/2007-12-23-pa-cable-fight&quot; target+&#039;blank&quot;&gt; Palo Alto Daily&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Access is difficult on AT&amp;amp;T cable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Palo Alto considers suit against telecom giant&lt;br /&gt;
By Kristina Peterson / Daily News Staff Writer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most Monday nights, the Palo Alto City Council meeting on Channel 26 is just a couple clicks away from any resident with cable television.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:05:44 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: Comcast applies for California video franchise</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1971</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://eldotelecom.blogspot.com/2007/12/comcast-applies-for-california-video.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Eldo Telecom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friday, December 21, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comcast applies for California video franchise&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comcast has joined cable providers Cox, Time Warner, Charter and Wave Broadband in applying for a statewide franchise with the California Public Utilities Commission under the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act that took effect in early 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:15:30 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: Time Warner customers misled by AT$T ad</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1706</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus17oct17,1,7383945,full.column?ctrack=2&amp;amp;cset=true&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; LA Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Time Warner customers misled by AT&amp;amp;T ad&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
October 17 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David Lazarus:&lt;br /&gt;
Consumer Confidential&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An ad from AT&amp;amp;T that ran the other day in these pages and elsewhere warned that some Time Warner Cable customers are in danger of losing phone service as the cable giant makes some technical changes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:18:43 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA: When Will Public Access TV Come to Fresno?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1652</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/09/25/18449723.php&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; IndyBay&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When Will Public Access TV Come to Fresno?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by Mike Rhodes&lt;br /&gt;
Tuesday Sep 25th, 2007 5:24 PM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    Now is the time to SUPPORT PEG access in Fresno.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When Will Public Access TV Come to Fresno?&lt;br /&gt;
By Mike Rhodes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Efforts to establish Public, Education, and Government (PEG) programing on the cable network in Fresno have been underway for over six years now. What happens in the next month or two will determine whether or not individuals and community groups will have an opportunity to produce and broadcast programs on Comcast cable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:35:15 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pending FCC ruling could affect cable franchises nationwide</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1629</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eurekareporter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?ArticleID=28447&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Eureka Reporter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pending FCC ruling could affect cable franchises nationwide&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by Steve Spain, The Eureka Reporter, 9/17/2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An imminent ruling by the Federal Communications Commission may toss municipal cable franchise agreements out the window. According to sources in Washington, D.C., the FCC is expected to rule next week on the ability of local governments to negotiate franchise contracts with cable and telecom operators.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/20">CALIFORNIA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/17">FCC Video Franchise</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:04:17 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
