<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - NORTH CAROLINA</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>NC: Local governments withhold public access TV funds</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2319</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orangepolitics.org/2008/05/local-governments-withhold-public-access-tv-funds&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Orange Politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Local governments withhold public access TV funds&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by Ruby Sinreich on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 11:50am.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems like Chapel Hill and Orange County are giving our local public access provider quite the run around, when they should be giving them money! The programming on The Peoples Channel includes a wide variety of creative output and civic endeavors by local residents, plus they also carry the essential Democracy Now! If you don&#039;t find what you want on channel 8, you can march right in to the station, get low-cost training, and fill that gap. This nonprofit TV station is a tremendous asset to our community, and it deserves to be fully funded by our local governments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:50:42 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: New public-access TV law comes with a price</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2233</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedurhamnews.com/around_town/story/123374.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Durham News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New public-access TV law comes with a price&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Samiha Khanna, Staff Writer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;East Durham resident Mattie Rouse doesn&#039;t have a car, and can&#039;t get around that easily on foot. So she doesn&#039;t get to Greater Joy Baptist Church much anymore to see the bishop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But she&#039;s hopeful she&#039;ll continue to be able to see him on cable Channel 8. Greater Joy&#039;s Bishop James Daniel is one of several ministers in Durham who have been broadcasting their sermons on Durham&#039;s public-access channel for nearly 20 years for free. Many of the shows are broadcast on Sundays and repeated during the week.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:03:32 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Durham to pay for public access TV</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/980210.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; News and Observer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Durham to pay for public access TV&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A city-county pact with Time Warner Cable sets a price of $120,000 for 10 months&#039; programs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Samiha Khanna, Staff Writer&lt;br /&gt;
DURHAM - City and county leaders agreed Monday to pay Time Warner Cable $120,000 over the next 10 months to air public access programs -- shows that used to be aired for free.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:44:21 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Franchise Law Helping … Cable Incumbents</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2163</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6533111.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;N.C. Franchise Law Helping … Cable Incumbents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
AT&amp;amp;T, Other Competitors Have Yet To Apply For Statewide Application&lt;br /&gt;
By Linda Haugsted -- Multichannel News, 2/16/2008 9:29:00 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; A bill designed to aid competitive video providers in North Carolina has actually deregulated many incumbent operators, while no new competitors have applied to serve the state, according to data compiled by a municipal consultant.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:03:12 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Cable TV PEG channels deserve lawmakers’ aid</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1543</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200770813050&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Citizen Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cable TV PEG channels deserve lawmakers’ aid&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
published August 14, 2007 12:15 am&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Competition usually results in lower prices and better service and products. Who can argue with that? The question is, better service and lower prices for whom?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the case of cable television franchises, a 2006 North Carolina law passed in an effort to encourage competition could eventually mean better service and lower prices for densely populated affluent areas. It could mean poor or no service for poor or rural areas.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:11:31 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: AT$T plans to offer state TV services</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1515</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070801/NEWSREC0101/70731024/-1/NEWSREC0201&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; News Record&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AT&amp;amp;T plans to offer state TV services&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Michelle Jarboe&lt;br /&gt;
Article published Aug 1, 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Television isn&#039;t calling. Yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T announced plans Tuesday to invest $350 million to upgrade its North Carolina network, with hopes of launching Internet television services in the state in several years .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 07:54:33 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Help Protect NC Community Media Centers</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1512</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bluenc.com/help-protect-nc-community-media-centers&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; BlueNC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Help Protect NC Community Media Centers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Submitted by BrianR on Mon, 07/30/2007 - 7:31pm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As many of you know, last session the State Legislature passed a law which allows cable and phone companies to avoid many of the public service requirements that have existed for over 30 years. Those requirements mainly have to do with channel space and support for Community Media Centers, like The Peoples Channel, and Public, Educational, and Government (PEG) Access channels. The bill has turned out to be a very serious blow to local governments and nonprofits like us. Many of us concerned with the legislation worked together to produce a new piece of legislation that would remedy two major problems with the bill: funding for Community Media Center and PEG channels, and deployment of broadband to rural and economically distressed communities.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:32:12 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Join NC Public Broadband List</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1504</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yesh.com/blog/2007/07/26/join-nc-public-broadband-list/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;Yesh.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Join NC Public Broadband List&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From Yesh.com, July 26, 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not long after I learned about HB1587, the bad NC House bill, I started a Google Group called NC Public Broadband. Its a email list with the goal of keeping people in the loop about what’s going on in the fight to protect community broadband. Its mainly an announce list but you can respond to emails. We can also upload files to share. Like a PDF of legislation or an Excel Spreadsheet of Legislative contact info.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:01:29 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Municipal Broadband Attacked in North Carolina</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1498</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewjacksondem.com/2007/07/19/municipal-broadband-attacked-in-north-carolina.aspx&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Andrew Jackson Democrats&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Municipal Broadband Attacked in North Carolina&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posted by CarolinaDem at 7/19/2007 12:40 PM and is filed under North Carolina Politics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the US lagging behind most of the developed world with less Internet access and slower speed connections, it&#039;s somewhat outrageous that any state government would block communities from extending broadband access to their citizens-- but North Carolina is now debating HB 1587, which is being promoted by the North Carolina Cable Telecommunications Association to stop local communities from owning and subsidizing access to community-run telecommunications systems.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:50:30 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Fiscal Problems Of Franchise Laws</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1489</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/85723?nocomments=1&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Fiscal Problems Of Franchise Laws&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
There&#039;s a problem when telecom companies write legislation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Video Service Competition Act, passed into law last year by the General Assembly in North Carolina, is your basic cable franchise agreement. It was supposed to increase competition, reducing pricing and give consumers more cable service choices.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:52:59 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: What happens when telecom companies write state legislation?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1482</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A156867&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Independent Weekly&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Touch that dial&lt;br /&gt;
What happens when telecom companies write state legislation? Check your wallet.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BY FIONA MORGAN&lt;br /&gt;
JULY 11, 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beware of legislation promising &quot;competition.&quot; A bill passed by the General Assembly last year that was intended to jump-start competition in the cable TV industry has had the unforeseen consequence of costing the state and local governments across North Carolina millions of dollars in lost revenue. And six months after the law went into effect, that promised competition is nowhere in sight.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:14:40 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Cities fight bill to limit broadband</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1390</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A155099&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Independent Weekly&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JUNE 6, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Cities fight bill to limit broadband&lt;br /&gt;
Legislature considers move some call &quot;No Competition Act&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BY FIONA MORGAN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state legislature is considering a bill that would severely restrict the ability of local governments to provide broadband Internet access. It would affect everything from Chapel Hill&#039;s evolving plan for downtown wi-fi access to city partnerships with private industry to some rural communities&#039; efforts to provide access to citizens stuck with nothing but dial-up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:27:21 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Bill would protect monopolies</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1321</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wilsondaily.com/Opinion/Editorials/288999756759505.php&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Wilson Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bill would protect monopolies&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tuesday, May 29, 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The short title of the bill is &quot;The Local Government Fair Competition Act,&quot; but the honest title should be &quot;The Monopolies Protection Act.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bill, which is in committee in the N.C. House, would establish a series of hurdles for local governments seeking to provide communications services, including telephone, cable television and Internet connections. While some of the provisions can be justified, others are transparently intended to discourage cities or counties from creating competing networks, such as the fiber-optic network the city of Wilson is already installing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 17:50:07 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Fiberoptics causes upset</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/660</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: Telcos and Cable Companies are also fighting municipal efforts at offering local residents additional competition for data/phone/cable services.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wilsondaily.com/Wil_region/Local_News/292126549078716.php&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Wilson Daily News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fiberoptics causes upset&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Matthew Shaw Daily Times Staff Writer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Wilson officials clashed Thursday night with a Time Warner Cable representative over the city&#039;s plans for a fiberoptic network.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:04:08 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC Faces State Franchise Vote</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/155</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; Another state in the sights of Telco state franchising efforts. If you have contacts in North Carolina, alert them to this news ASAP. See &lt;a href=&quot;&lt;http://www.ncccmc.org&gt;&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; www.ncccmc.org &lt;/a&gt;for more info/&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friends,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A bill in the N.C. House of Representatives, HB 2047, &quot;The Video Service Competition Act&quot;, would eliminate local government authority over cable TV franchising, consolidating the power to grant local video franchises in Raleigh.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 15:46:44 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
