<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - SOUTH CAROLINA</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/35/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>SC: Is Public TV In Peril?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2165</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.columbiacitypaper.com/2008/2/14/is-public-tv-in-peril&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Columbia City Paper&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is Public TV In Peril?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Todd Morehead&lt;br /&gt;
February 14 12:35 PM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One year from now, television as we know it will change forever. For those who haven’t yet purchased a converter box, are not cable subscribers or don’t have a compatible TV, the screen will go dark on Feb. 17, 2009 as the industry switches from broadcasting a traditional analog signal to a digital one. The “DTV switch,” as it has come to be known, will not only facilitate the continued progression toward high definition systems but will also free up the 700 MHz spectrum for the creation of more standardized public safety communications. In the background, the FCC has plans to auction a chunk of that vacated analog spectrum to large wireless and telecom companies like Verizon and Google. Some analysts predict the sale could fetch up to $15 billion dollars. Meanwhile, many Democrats on Capitol Hill worry that an unprepared and under funded FCC has not adequately educated the general public about the DTV switch.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/35">SOUTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:07:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>South Carolina Approves Statewide Video Franchise Bill</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/127</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; South Carolina joins a number of other states where the telcos have won statewide franchises&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from:&lt;a href=&quot;http://njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-HLYJ1147896208668.html&quot; target=&quot;bank&quot;&gt;Technology Daily&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;South Carolina Approves Bill For Statewide Video Franchises&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Michael Martinez&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Revised Wednesday, May 17) The South Carolina Legislature has cleared a measure to overhaul the state&#039;s video franchising rules.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/35">SOUTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 06:49:49 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
