<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - WISCONSIN</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>WI: Charter is dropping cable deal with Madison; Madison City Channel</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2326</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/local/287414&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Wisconsin State Journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Charter is dropping cable deal with Madison; Madison City Channel, WYOU could move to triple digits&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DEAN MOSIMAN&lt;br /&gt;
608-252-6141&lt;br /&gt;
dmosiman@madison.com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charter Communications is opting out of its cable franchise deal with Madison, which may mean changes for the city&#039;s government and public access TV stations.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 07:01:47 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Charter&#039;s New Franchise Could Jeopardize City-Run Channels</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2323</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel3000.com/news/16356668/detail.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Channel 3000&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Charter&#039;s New Franchise Could Jeopardize City-Run Channels&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Charter Terminates Financial Agreement With Municipalities&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;POSTED: 7:54 pm CDT May 21, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
UPDATED: 10:32 pm CDT May 21, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MADISON, Wis. -- The future of city-run cable channels is in question after Charter Communications pulled its cable franchise agreements with municipalities across the state.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 06:51:06 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: AT$T still not definite on U-verse here</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2310</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/business/283540&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Capital Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AT&amp;amp;T still not definite on U-verse here&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff Richgels  —  4/28/2008 11:26 am&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is looking to hire 200 more technicians to install and service its U-verse TV service, which now is available to more than 200,000 homes in the Milwaukee, Racine and Sheboygan areas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even though the jobs include positions in south central Wisconsin, indicating that U-verse may be offered here in the near future, the company still isn&#039;t saying when the Madison area might get U-verse.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:12:30 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Cable providers in Wisconsin seek statewide franchises</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2219</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/stories/2008/03/03/daily24.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Business Journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, March 4, 2008 - 2:55 PM CST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Cable providers in Wisconsin seek statewide franchises&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Business Journal of Milwaukee&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five Wisconsin cable and video service providers - Charter Communications Inc., Time Warner Cable, AT&amp;amp;T Inc., CenturyTel and Comcast Cable - have applied for statewide video franchises under legislation passed last year.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:15:22 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: AT$T is not being transparent about exploding cabinets</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2187</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: This is an article from earlier this month, and prior to the request of the The National Association of Real Estate Brokers to have the Attorney Generals of five states investigate AT&amp;amp;T (according to Light Reading NAREB has since &lt;a href=&quot;http://saveaccess.org/node/2174&quot;&gt;backed down&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biztimes.com/blogs/milwaukee-biz-blog/2008/2/6/at-t-is-not-being-transparent-about-exploding-cabinets&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Milwaukee Biz Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:44:01 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Tornado destroys woman’s house: Time Warner Cable bills her $2,025.45</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2143</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=3144&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; ZDNet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;January 31st, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Tornado destroyed woman’s house: then she gets this $2,025.45 bill from Time Warner Cable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posted by Russell Shaw @ 3:21 pm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From Wisconsin’s Kenosha News comes this story that after a January 7 tornado demolished her home, and ensuing rain and snow made it a bear to fix, a woman from the area has received a $2,025.45 bill from her (now former, well duh) cable television service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:47:09 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: A case study in how corporations get the legislation they want</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2139</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=background.view&amp;amp;backgroundid=00226&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Nieman Watchdog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wisconsin: A case study in how corporations get the legislation they want&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;info&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
COMMENTARY | January 31, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Telecom and broadband expert and activist Bruce Kushnick describes how model corporate bills get introduced and enacted in Wisconsin, to the detriment of the common good. (Second of two articles.)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:14:35 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Reverse for AT$T&#039;s U-verse video?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2102</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/business/269108&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Madison Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reverse for AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s U-verse video?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff Richgels  —  1/24/2008 3:45 pm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could AT&amp;amp;T be out of the video business before it even brings its U-verse service to Madison?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s possible, according to TVPredictions.com president Phillip &quot;Swanni&quot; Swann, who predicts AT&amp;amp;T will be out of the video business within 12 to 18 months, CedMagazine.com reported.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:11:53 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Exclusive Photos: Fire to the Node</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2084</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=143632&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Light Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exclusive Photos: Fire to the Node, Part II&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
JANUARY 22, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week, Light Reading broke the news that AT&amp;amp;T Inc. (NYSE: T - message board) has set out to replace the 17,000 Avestor batteries providing backup power to its U-verse network equipment cabinets in neighborhoods all over America. (See AT&amp;amp;T Begins Massive Battery Replacement.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:47:11 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: The video competition bill is now law - take action!</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2068</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saveaccessTVwisconsin.org&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; WAPC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;January 17, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dear PEG Access Television Supporters:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The video competition bill is now law.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; You and WAPC have spent the last year working hard to ensure AB207 would not spell the end to PEG access television in Wisconsin.  I can report that we have succeeded, yet even the Governor, who signed the bill on December 21, admitted concerns about PEG&#039;s future under this law -- Act 42 -- and urged lawmakers to consider remedial legislation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:32:56 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Wauwatosa residents had expressed safety concerns over AT$T cabinets</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2044</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wauwatosa residents had expressed safety concerns over AT&amp;amp;T cabinets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nearly a year before the recent explosion of an AT&amp;amp;T VRAD cabinet in Wauwatosa Wisconsin, some local residents had expressed safety concerns about the large boxes.  At a February 12, 2007, City Planning Commission Meeting, residents opposed the installation of a VRAD box and had sent emails and information to the Commission making specific reference to the fires and explosions in Houston Texas. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:20:13 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Your World Delivered . . . On Fire</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2018</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;image&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://saveaccess.org/node/2018&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;sites/saveaccess.org/files/images/vrad.jpg&quot; width=&quot;480&quot; height=&quot;208&quot; alt=&quot;VRAD Article image&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Another AT&amp;amp;T U-verse VRAD Cabinet Explodes &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Updates 1/15/08: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=143185&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; AT&amp;amp;T Begins Massive Battery Replacement&lt;/a&gt; (Light Reading).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://saveaccess.org/node/2044&quot;&gt;Wauwatosa residents had expressed safety concerns over AT&amp;amp;T cabinets&lt;/a&gt; (Save Access)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=143632&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Additional Photos&lt;/a&gt; (Light Reading 1/22/08)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the early hours of Christmas morning, an AT&amp;amp;T VRAD cabinet (DSLAM) exploded in the city of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. Only days earlier,  Governor Jim Doyle had signed Assembly Bill 207, a statewide cable franchise bill pushed through by AT&amp;amp;T despite the best efforts of municipalities and public interest advocates to stop it.  A saveaccess reader concerned over the lack of any local or regional news coverage sent us the following note with the attached photos:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:59:17 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Gov should have vetoed cable bill</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2001</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/265865&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Capital Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gov should have vetoed cable bill&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An editorial  —  1/07/2008 9:59 am&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gov. Jim Doyle recognized that Assembly Bill 207, the plan to restructure cable regulations to favor AT&amp;amp;T and other big telecom companies, was flawed legislation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That recognition led Doyle to veto substantial portions of the proposal that was crafted by AT&amp;amp;T lobbyists and that critics say was advanced by Republicans in the Assembly and Democrats in the Senate in order to satisfy the demands of big campaign donors.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:03:14 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Editorial: Competition for cable</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1975</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=700693&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Journal Sentinal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Editorial: Competition for cable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A bill signed by Gov. Jim Doyle opens the state for increased competition in video services, which will help consumers if rule-making doesn&#039;t needlessly slow the process down.&lt;br /&gt;
From the Journal Sentinel&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: Dec. 26, 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wisconsin residents should see the value of increased competition for video services now that cable television&#039;s hammerlock is about to be pried loose.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:30:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Don&#039;t hold breath for new services under state cable law</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1970</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/news/263600&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Madison.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Prof: Don&#039;t hold breath for new services under state cable law&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff Richgels and Judith Davidoff  —  12/22/2007 7:32 am&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gov. Jim Doyle&#039;s signing of the state cable franchising bill isn&#039;t likely to mean AT&amp;amp;T -- a leading backer of the bill -- will bring its U-verse TV service to the Madison area anytime soon, one prominent observer said.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:05:19 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
