<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - Net Neutrality</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>test</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/robtest</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;just a test&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/17">FCC Video Franchise</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:23:47 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When Capacity Is Never Enough</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2275</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6544071.html?industryid=47194&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COVER STORY: &lt;strong&gt;When Capacity Is Never Enough&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Cautionary Tale Of Video Downloads&lt;br /&gt;
By Tom Steinert-Threlkeld -- Multichannel News, 3/22/2008 5:34:00 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON, D.C. -- A bit is a bit is a bit. An electronic packet of data is a packet is a packet. Unless you look inside to see what it contains.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:24:07 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Net Neutrality Matters for PEG Access TV</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2218</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://cmediachange.net/blog/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Commnity Media in Transition&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why Net Neutrality Matters for PEG Access TV&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;March 2nd, 2008 by Colin Rhinesmith&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At last week’s FCC hearing at Harvard Law School, the issue of network neutrality once again took center stage. As the Internet giant Google describes the issue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;em&gt;   “Network neutrality is the principle that Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they use on the Internet.”&lt;/eM&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:51:25 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast Manipulating NAACP on Net Neutrality</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2207</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4209&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Open Left&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Comcast Manipulating NAACP on Net Neutrality&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By now you&#039;ve probably heard that Comcast hired a crowd to sit in an FCC hearing on net neutrality so interested citizens couldn&#039;t get a spot to speak.  The gist of Comcast&#039;s excuse is that they hired people to hold spots for Comcast employees, though those people accidentally fell asleep and stayed in their seats throughout the entire hearing.  Nuts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:29:48 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Comcast vs. Verizon, Comcast is Down Two Counts</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2205</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drewclark.com/in-comcast-vs-verizon-comcast-is-down-two-counts/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Drew Clark&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In Comcast vs. Verizon, Comcast is Down Two Counts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
February 27th, 2008 · No Comments&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Drew Clark&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dominance in the broadband market is a battle of both technology and politics. Right now Comcast, America’s leading cable company, is losing on both counts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:50:02 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Comcast Paying Folks to Attend FCC Hearing Is Wrong.</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2202</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: We hear it&#039;s common practice for corporations and lobbyists to hire line waiters and seat warmers for Congressional hearings too - this is why you only see suits in the front rows of major hearings. Apparently democracy has a price . . .&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/1087&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Wet Machine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;For the Clueless Among Us: Why Comcast Paying Folks to Attend FCC Hearing Is Wrong. I can&#039;t believe I actually need to explain this.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:55:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCC En Banc: Annals of the Battle for the Last Mile</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2201</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://fredjohnson.mwg.org/?p=65&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Media - Space - Place - Network&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FCC En Banc: Annals of the Battle for the Last Mile&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
February 26th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
Fred Johnson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Harvard Law School was “Markey Country” today as Massachusetts Congressman Ed Markey defended net neutrality in his opening remarks before the FCC’s Public En Banc Hearing on broadband network management practices in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Markey declared the US “no country for old bandwidth” and hung around to observe, with the rest of us, the FCC, “en banc” and securely enclosed in Harvard space droning through a tedious day of testimony and q&amp;amp;a, comfortably surrounded by an audience packed with polite but bored Comcast employees trained to provide applause on cue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:28:10 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Summary on the Comcast/FCC Net Neutrality Hearing</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2196</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Comcast Threatens the Open Internet – FCC Hears Complaints&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Last summer, users of Comcast internet services reported cut-offs and significant decreases in their download speeds when they were sharing large content such as video, audio and data files using a peer-to-peer sharing application known as Bit Torrent (&lt;a href=&quot;http://bittorrent.com&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;www.bittorrent.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:10:40 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Telecom Campaign Money Shifts to Democrats in Net Neutrality Fight</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2140</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoconfidential.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3392&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Colorado Confidential&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Telecom Campaign Money Shifts to Democrats in Net Neutrality Fight&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;January 30, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Dan Whipple&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the new Congress considers legislating network neutrality for internet service providers, telecoms in Colorado are piling on the campaign cash for Democrats who will decide the issue. Campaign donations from telecoms in the state have shifted dramatically from Republican candidates to Democratic ones over the 2004-2008 election cycles.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/41">COLORADO</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:17:07 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>P2P users blast Comcast in FCC proceeding</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2121</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080129-p2p-users-blast-comcast-in-fcc-proceeding.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;P2P users blast Comcast in FCC proceeding&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Matthew Lasar | Published: January 29, 2008 - 08:14AM CT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two weeks into a Federal Communications Commission public comment period on whether Comcast deliberately degrades P2P broadband traffic, there&#039;s no shortage of angry users who feel cheated and want the tampering to stop. Evidence is also mounting that Comcast is blocking more than just P2P traffic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:39:38 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>With Comcast Under Fire, Vuze Enjoys Growth Surge</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2092</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/internet/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=205901705&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Information Week&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;With Comcast Under Fire, Vuze Enjoys Growth Surge&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From InformationWeek, January 18, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Richard Martin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While controversy swirls around the struggle between traditional big-pipe entertainment providers to the home — specifically the cable carriers and namely Comcast, the nation’s largest cable TV service — and providers of online peer-to-peer content services, particularly BitTorrent, the market for online movies and other forms of content continues to grow apace.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:08:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon, Industry Comment On Time Warner Cable Plans</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2082</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Verizon-Industry-Comment-On-Time-Warner-Cable-Plans-91172&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon, Industry Comment On Time Warner Cable Plans&lt;br /&gt;
Verizon taunts MSO, analysts think low caps are a ripoff&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
03:10PM Monday Jan 21 2008 by Karl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As we were the first to report last week, Time Warner Cable will be testing overage charges in one of the company&#039;s Texas markets. We&#039;ve noted that Charter is also exploring metered bandwidth, and Business Week confirms that Comcast and Cox are as well. In the Business Week report, Verizon takes aim at the cable industry, suggesting that Time Warner Cable is interested in the plans because they lack bandwidth:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:57:58 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Has AT$T Lost Its Mind?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2081</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2182152/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Slate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Has AT&amp;amp;T Lost Its Mind? A baffling proposal to filter the Internet.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Tim Wu&lt;br /&gt;
Posted Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2008, at 10:15 AM ET&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chances are that as you read this article, it is passing over part of AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s network. That matters, because last week AT&amp;amp;T announced that it is seriously considering plans to examine all the traffic it carries for potential violations of U.S. intellectual property laws. The prospect of AT&amp;amp;T, already accused of spying on our telephone calls, now scanning every e-mail and download for outlawed content is way too totalitarian for my tastes. But the bizarre twist is that the proposal is such a bad idea that it would be not just a disservice to the public but probably a disaster for AT&amp;amp;T itself. If I were a shareholder, I&#039;d want to know one thing: Has AT&amp;amp;T, after 122 years in business, simply lost its mind?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/50">NSA/Telco Wiretap Scandal</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:56:05 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Talking About AT$T&#039;s Internet Filtering</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2080</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/01/21/talking-about-atts-i.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Boing Boing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Talking About AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s Internet Filtering on AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s The Hugh Thompson Show&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posted by Joel Johnson, January 21, 2008 5:23 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;373&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/bY6cCGENlj8&amp;amp;rel=1&amp;amp;border=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/bY6cCGENlj8&amp;amp;rel=1&amp;amp;border=1&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;373&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:24:26 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AT$T Concessions Prove Meaningless</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2013</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/01/10/att-concessions-prove-meaningless&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;Web Pro News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AT&amp;amp;T Concessions Prove Meaningless&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;January 10, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Jason Lee Miller&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remember how after AT&amp;amp;T made Net Neutrality concessions to get their merger with BellSouth approved, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin was so quick to remind everybody that the FCC had no teeth to enforce that? Well, the lack of teeth is coming back to bite us.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/52">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:44:48 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
