<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - Municipal/Rural Broadband</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>KY: Connect Kentucky Disconnected At Home</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2298</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1521&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Public Knowledge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Connect Kentucky Disconnected At Home&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Art Brodsky on April 14, 2008 - 5:11pm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Connected Nation is expanding around the country, it hit a big snag at home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear (D) Monday let the world know what his administration thinks of the controversial Connect Kentucky program. He vetoed $2.4 million in funds for the organization, which was founded under his predecessor, Republican Ernie Fletcher. Background on the program is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1334&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:48:12 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Tennessee Franchising Bill Aims To Extend Broadband Services</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2293</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6550755.html?q=Linda+Haugsted&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tennessee Franchising Bill Aims To Extend Broadband Services&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Local Governments Could Also Subsidize Deployment If Private Sector Passes&lt;br /&gt;
By Linda Haugsted -- Multichannel News, 4/11/2008 1:10:00 PM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Legislators in Tennessee have been presented a new version of a state franchising bill with a unique scheme to provide an incentive to new providers to extend broadband services.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:18:10 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hopes for Wireless Cities Are Fading</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2262</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/22/us/22wireless.html?pagewanted=2&amp;amp;hp&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; NY Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;March 22, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Hopes for Wireless Cities Are Fading&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By IAN URBINA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PHILADELPHIA — It was hailed as Internet for the masses when Philadelphia officials announced plans in 2005 to erect the largest municipal Wi-Fi grid in the country, stretching wireless access over 135 square miles with the hope of bringing free or low-cost service to all residents, especially the poor.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:58:47 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Connect Tennessee and the Battle over State Franchising</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2210</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bitchslappin.net/the-telecomm-goliaths/connect-tennessee-and-the-battle-over-state-franchising&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Bitch Slappin&#039;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Connect Tennessee and the Battle over State Franchising&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s another AT&amp;amp;T sponsored Cable Franchising Bill in Tennessee, this one being pushed by the Telecom Astroturf group “Connected Tennessee“. It’s not the only Tennessee Cable Franchise bill, but it is the one getting the most press and attention, probably because of the dough that’s being slung around, and now that telecom money is being handed out to Democrats, much to the chagrin of the Repuglycans, who seem to be running on a budget these days.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:01:19 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Connected TN Backers A Front for AT$T? (Part 2)</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2198</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://cupofjoepowell.blogspot.com/2008/02/connected-tn-backers-front-for-at-part.html target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Cup of Joe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, February 26, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Connected TN Backers A Front for AT&amp;amp;T? (Part 2)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a couple of updates to add on my post from last week regarding the creation of state and national programs focusing on expanding internet access which also seems to work not only as a PR machine for AT&amp;amp;T but as a lobbying agency as well. A flurry of activity has been taking place and rapid changes are ahead.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:23:04 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Connected Tennessee Backers A Front for AT$T?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2197</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from:&lt;a href=&quot;http://cupofjoepowell.blogspot.com/2008/02/connected-tennessee-backers-front-for.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Cup of Joe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, February 19, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Connected Tennessee Backers A Front for AT&amp;amp;T?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A recent examination of a program to expand internet access, which began in Kentucky and then moved into Tennessee and now goes under the name Connected Nation raises some concerns that the entire project is basically a PR machine for AT&amp;amp;T.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:21:18 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TN: Telecoms compete EPB set to challenge Comcast for local customers</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2190</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://timesfreepress.com/news/2008/feb/26/telecoms-compete-epb-set-challenge-comcast-local-c/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Times Free Press&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Telecoms compete EPB set to challenge Comcast for local customers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By: Jason Reynolds&lt;br /&gt;
TimesFreePress Audio&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the past, Comcast only offered cable programming and EPB just sold electricity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, Comcast offers telephone and Internet service as well, and EPB is poised to offer the complete package of video, telephone and Internet service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/36">TENNESSEE</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:24:34 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Connected Nation&#039;s $134 Billion Fish Tale?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2185</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Connected-Nations-134-Billion-Fish-Tale-92074&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Connected Nation&#039;s $134 Billion Fish Tale?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;Editorial: Lets make sure we adopt the RIGHT national broadband policy....&lt;br&gt;12:00PM Friday Feb 22 2008 by Karl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last month Public Knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/90901&quot;&gt;penned a piece&lt;/a&gt; that suggested that Connected Nation, a group supposedly created to push a national broadband policy, was actually now essentially a baby bell lobbying effort. The allegation was that what started as a real, local Kentucky effort to map U&amp;#46S&amp;#46 broadband penetration, has ultimately been hijacked by baby bell lobbyists, and now exists primarily as a way to protect those companies&#039; interests under the guise of a national broadband deployment model. If true, it&#039;s absolutely ingenious in a robustly amoral way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:18:45 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Maryland Broadband Bills Should Send Connect Kentucky Home</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2179</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1400&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Public Knowlegde&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maryland Broadband Bills Should Send Connect Kentucky Home&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From Public Knowledge, February 19, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Art Brodsky&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the next couple of weeks, the Maryland General Assembly will consider a modest step in helping to further the spread of high-speed Internet services in the state. It could be a positive step, or a harmful misstep.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/44">MARYLAND</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:18:57 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More than Rhetoric Needed to Close Broadband Gap</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2136</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benton.org/node/8947&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Benton Foundation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More than Rhetoric Needed to Close Broadband Gap&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush Administration&#039;s Disputed Claims that High-Speed Internet Access is Universal and Affordable&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2004, during a campaign appearance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, President Bush set an ambitious and laudable goal, he said, &quot;We ought to have universal affordable access for broadband technology by the year 2007.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:06:27 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>VT: Rural Towns Bundling a Blueprint for Broadband</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2107</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: Despite many common misconceptions, Vermont actually is a state in the USA. Given the Vermont&#039;s headway and success in municipal broadband projects, other states would do well to take a closer look.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080124/NEWS02/801240322/1007&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Burlington Free Press&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rural Towns Bundling a Blueprint for Broadband&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:30:30 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ConnectKentucky should get lump of coal</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2076</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: An older post, but worth revisiting given the recent interest in ConnectKy.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://glasgowredbluegreen.blogspot.com/2007/12/connectkentucky-should-get-lump-of-coal.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Red, Blue and Green&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friday, December 21, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;ConnectKentucky should get lump of coal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a subject I first addressed a few weeks ago but it continues to deserve our attention. The background is that this organization, whose members are generally the big, rich, telephone companies and privately owned cable companies, ConnectKentucky, is hanging around our state legislature looking to siphon off our tax revenues for their own selfish purposes. They have been quite successful at this in the past. During the last couple of legislative sessions they have already been successful in getting millions of our tax dollars by claiming that they have a magic potion that results in more broadband facilities being built for the people of Kentucky.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:28:17 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ConnectKentucky Wants Your Tax Dollars</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2075</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: An older post, but worth revisiting given the recent interest in ConnectKy.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://glasgowredbluegreen.blogspot.com/2007/12/connectkentucky-wants-your-tax-dollars.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Red, Blue and Green&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, December 4, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;ConnectKentucky Wants Your Tax Dollars&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is sort of a &quot;rerun&quot; post. I first commented on this topic back in August when I was first experimenting with the creation of this site. However, now it is on the front burner again because ConnectKentucky is trying to ram a piece of legislation through the next session of the Kentucky Legislature aimed at further enriching some of its members.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:25:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Connect Kentucky Article Raises Bell Lobby Specter</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2070</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drewclark.com/connect-kentucky-article-raises-bell-lobby-specter/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; DrewClark.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Connect Kentucky Article Raises Bell Lobby Specter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
January 17th, 2008&lt;a&lt;br /&gt;
By Drew Clark&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 11pt&quot;&gt;Art Brodsky’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1334&quot;&gt;4,789-word article&lt;/a&gt; about Connect Kentucky and its offspring Connected Nation has been the talk of telecom circles over the past week.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:32:37 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Municipal WiFi Provider Forces Local Monopoly to Offer Free Broadband Service</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2025</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://buzz.lawrencian.com/lfnwifi.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Lawerncian.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Municipal WiFi Provider Forces Local Monopoly to Offer Free Broadband Service&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by Matt Del Vecchio&lt;br /&gt;
Jan 11, 2008 at 09:32 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an environment where troubled municipal Wi-Fi projects are showing up on front pages around the nation, a municipal Wi-Fi project in Lawrence, Kansas is using Wi-Fi to give one of the nation’s most dominant media companies a run for its money.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:52:19 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
