<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - Astroturf / Front Group</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>LA: TV4US Astroturf Org Active in Louisiana</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2302</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://lafayetteprofiber.com/Blog/2008/03/tv4us-astroturf-org-active-in-louisiana.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Lafayette Pro Fiber&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wednesday, March 26, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;TV4US Astroturf Org Active in Louisiana&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, we knew it was coming. The legislature is coming back in session and the latest push to take take local municipal property rights and hand them over to AT&amp;amp;T is back.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/46">LOUISIANA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:57:54 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IN: Indiana’s TV Law Lauded</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2222</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6537150.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Multichannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Indiana’s TV Law Lauded&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by Linda Haugsted -- Multichannel News, 3/3/2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ball State University researchers said Indiana’s 2006 telecommunications-reform bill has advanced the deployment of video and broadband services in the state, a finding disputed by incumbent cable operators.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/25">INDIANA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:37:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When &#039;Civil Rights Groups&#039; Become Paid ISP Lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2216</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/When-Civil-Rights-Groups-Become-Paid-ISP-Lobbyists-92323&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When &#039;Civil Rights Groups&#039; Become Paid ISP Lobbyists&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And the technology press doesn&#039;t notice...&lt;br /&gt;
09:42AM Monday Mar 03 2008 by Karl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the most effective ways the phone companies have gotten what they want politically over the years is to fake the fact that they have consumer support. This is done via PR, farmed think tank science, hired bloggers (who don&#039;t allow comments), fake consumer groups and astroturf (fake grass roots) campaigns. Such efforts can make it appear that anti-consumer positions -- such as cherry picking broadband deployment or elimination of consumer protection laws -- have broad consumer support.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:27:25 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Telecomms, Lobbyists, State Government and Big Media</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2057</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bitchslappin.net/various-idiots/the-telecomms-lobbyists-state-government-and-big-media&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; BitchSlappin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Telecomms, Lobbyists, State Government and Big Media&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1/14/08&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The small local independent papers are full of news that is NOT being picked up by Big Media, and when you put these pieces together it shows how broken things are. First are the stories about the big telecomms steamrolling into statehouses and buying state congressmen right and left, not to mention Governors, to get their state franchise legislation and deregulation pushed through, bad state legislation that trashes Public Access TV, lessens or trashes completely the ability for municipalities to control their own right of ways, allows the franchisees to cherry pick  the areas they wish to serve, negates any oversight on the consumer complaint process, overrides current franchise agreements in place that provide access to libraries, schools and municipal government as part of the agreement, and all kinds of other giveaways. Then there are the stories of what has gone wrong in the states where state franchising exists.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:17:19 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ten Worst Telco Moments of 2007</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1964</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: Our list of Telco &#039;worst&#039; moments would be a bit longer - and includes items like the ongoing attacks on PEG, exploding telco dslam boxes, and heavy-handed and costly political lobbying. But this list is a good start and it&#039;s safe to say the telcos and cablecos need a bit more watching.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-karr/ten-worst-telco-moments-o_b_77748.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/50">NSA/Telco Wiretap Scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/11">Qwest</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:20:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How much of your state’s legislation is being drafted by industry?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1905</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ask_this.view&amp;amp;askthisid=00304&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Nieman Watchdog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How much of your state’s legislation is being drafted by industry?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;ASK THIS&lt;/b&gt; | November 30, 2007&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The American Legislative Council, or ALEC, lets corporations cultivate legislators and win support for industry-written bills while not technically breaking lobbying rules  – and paying no taxes. (First of two articles)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:19:57 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Corporate-funded research designed to influence public policy</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1658</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=background.view&amp;amp;backgroundid=00208&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Neiman Watchdog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Corporate-funded research designed to influence public policy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;info&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;COMMENTARY&lt;/b&gt; | October 01, 2007&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;intro&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reports by well-known think tanks and individuals funded by telecoms are helping quash competition, increase phone rates and set up a corporate-oriented Internet system. Is there any reason to trust these reports? Or to trust experts who testify before regulators without revealing the sources of their funding?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:13:41 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Opponents Slow Video Franchise Reforms</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1657</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: This report riddled with inaccuracies and misleading conclusions is from one of our favorite astroturf think tanks. Heartland provides the industries that fund their &#039;research&#039; with persuasive reports for misleading legislators. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=22080&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Heartland Institute&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Opponents Slow Video Franchise Reforms&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:05:07 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: AT$T front group won&#039;t face legal investigation</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1565</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/2007/08/attbacked_group_wont_face_wis.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; National journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AT&amp;amp;T-Backed Group Won&#039;t Face Wis. Probe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Michael Martinez&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Monday, August 20) The top law enforcer in Wisconsin has decided not to formally investigate an advocacy group that misrepresented a pair of state lawmakers&#039; positions on a pending telecommunications bill.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:41:05 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Will an &quot;Exaflood&quot; Slow Net Traffic?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1552</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: The word &quot;exaflood&quot; is worth watching and should be associated with the elimination of net neutrality since many of those engaged in this creative writing have that intention. Also, watch the Internet Innovation Alliance and their member orgs carefully.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://techpolicysummit.blogs.com/tech_policy_summit/2007/08/is-the-net-maxi.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Tech Policy Summit Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:39:40 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: New Coalition Attempts to Squash Controversial Cable Bill</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1485</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/news/200919&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Capital Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Coalition Attempts to Squash Controversial Cable Bill in Wisconsin&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From Capital Times, July 11, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
By Judith Davidoff&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Saying consumers have been excluded from the debate, a new coalition announced efforts today to fight efforts by AT&amp;amp;T and state legislators to deregulate the cable television industry.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:23:39 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Teletruth Wisconsin Founded</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1481</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.teletruth.org/Wisconsin.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Teletruth Wisconsin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Teletruth Wisconsin News Alert, July 11th, 2007.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Press Conference, Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 10 am,&lt;br /&gt;
Senate Parlor, State Capitol, Madison, Wisconsin. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Subject: To announce the creation of TeleTruth Wisconsin, a broad new alliance of citizen groups and individuals concerned about the pending cable TV legislation - SB 107 / AB 207 - being promoted by AT&amp;amp;T and their affiliate, TV4US.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:11:58 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon, AT$T and the manipulation of public opinion</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1480</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=background.view&amp;amp;backgroundid=00167&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Neiman Watchdog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon, AT&amp;amp;T and the manipulation of public opinion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COMMENTARY | April 04, 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Needed: Blacks, Hispanics, disabled, deaf, low-income and the elderly to support the telecoms’ positions on anti-consumer FCC rulings and legislation.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:04:37 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Unreliable info on cable reform</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1470</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: TV4US is up to their usual tricks, now in Wisconsin. Such dishonest campaigning on behalf of corporations (AT&amp;amp;T or anyone for that matter) should be made illegal. Unfortunately, a Bill doing as such was voted down by Republicans in Congress earlier this session.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/200636&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Capital Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Unreliable info on cable reform&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:06:38 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WI: Residents also irked by action on cable</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1465</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/local/index.php?ntid=200268&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Madison.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Residents also irked by action on cable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MARK PITSCH&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FRI., JUL 6, 2007 - 10:11 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some Madison residents who told an advocacy group they supported competition for cable television providers said they&#039;re angry the group implied to state lawmakers that they endorsed specific legislation affecting cable TV.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/38">WISCONSIN</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:08:55 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
