<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - Senate S.2686</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>MO: Cable&#039;s future up for grabs in Cape</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1225</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.semissourian.com/story/print/1211697.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Southeast Missourian&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cable&#039;s future up for grabs in Cape&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tuesday, May 15, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
By TJ Greaney &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cable television in Southeast Missouri is about to change for good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New legislation means competition is on the horizon for current monopoly-holder Charter Communications, while municipal oversight and funding for public access channels are both in jeopardy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/29">MISSOURI</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 22:15:52 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The New Senate Commerce Committee Members - How They Voted Last Session on ATOR S2686/HR5252</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/687</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;picture&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;sites/saveaccess.org/files/images/politician.jpg&quot; width=&quot;60&quot; height=&quot;144&quot; alt=&quot;astroturf sample&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was the vote last summer on S2686 (later named HR5252) in the 109th Congressional Session: 15-7 with all 12 Republicans and 3 Democrats voting for the bill. The new Democratic majority will hopefully alter the equation in this session.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:28:57 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Q/A with Nick Miller, Miller and Van Eaton</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/655</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/info/CA6341226.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Multichannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Q/A with Nick Miller, Miller &amp;amp; Van Eaton&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nick Miller is an expert in the law and policy governing cable television and telephone regulation, and in the legislative aspects of communications law. He represents local governments, airports, and national local government associations in cable television and telecommunications matters. He has worked extensively with international multilateral agencies engaged in telecommunications policy advice to developing countries. Miller talked to Focus on Customer Care about franchising. An edited transcript follows:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/3">HR.5252 COPE</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:43:15 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCC votes on cable franchise reform this Wednesday</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/590</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061218-8445.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FCC votes on cable franchise reform this Wednesday&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12/18/2006 1:45:24 PM, by Nate Anderson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rules for local video franchising could be changing this Wednesday. At the agency&#039;s open meeting this week, Commissioners will &quot;consider a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding Section 621(a)(1)&#039;s directive that local franchising authorities not unreasonably refused to award competitive franchises.&quot; If that&#039;s the sort of language that makes your eyes glaze over, then it&#039;s time to hit the coffee pot, because this could be big news for AT&amp;amp;T, Verizon, and other telecom firms that want to enter the television market.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:50:30 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fighting AT$T: The battle over franchise agreements</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/589</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/80365&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fighting AT&amp;amp;T&lt;br /&gt;
The battle over franchise agreements&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Posted 2006-12-18 14:24:21 by Karl  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you ask telco execs, lobbyists and the FCC, local video franchise agreements are the worst kind of bureaucracy. Towns are little more than greedy parasites that make absurd demands at every opportunity and rarely have local residents&#039; interests in mind. Telco lobbyists suggest that the existing franchise system needs a lobotomy, and by replacing the current system with statewide or federal system, they can speed up next-gen broadband and IPTV deployment. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:38:53 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Video-Franchise Law in Neutral</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/586</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6400573.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Broadcasting and Cable&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Washington Watch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting &amp;amp; Cable, 12/18/2006&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Video-Franchise Law in Neutral&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Telephone companies spent millions of dollars pushing for national video-franchise reform that would allow them to more easily compete with cable in video and broadband access.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:13:10 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft tells FCC what it wants for Christmas</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/583</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Microsoft is the software provider for AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s cable system set-top box - they stand to gain from imposed video franchise legislation.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lasarletter.net/drupal/node/261&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Lasar Letter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft tells FCC what it wants for Christmas&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by Matthew Lasar  Dec 12 2006  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft executives spent much of the first week of this month at the Federal Communications Commission, meeting with Commissioners and staff. Not only did they lobby for specific regulatory policies, they outlined a broad agenda for the FCC to follow in the years ahead.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:52:44 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Huge Victory for Real People as Telco Bill Dies</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/576</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; Celebrate - then call the FCC!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/12/08/congress-closes-telco-bill-dies-on-the-vine/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; SavetheInternet.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Huge Victory for Real People as Telco Bill Dies&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gavel has fallen on the 109th Congress marking the demise of entrenched corporate efforts to legislate away our Internet freedoms — and a stunning victory for real people who want to retain control of the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:24:55 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On Building a Progressive Governing Coalition Around Net Neutrality</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/564</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/12/6/125958/142#commenttop&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MyDD&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On Building a Progressive Governing Coalition Around Net Neutrality&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by Matt Stoller, Wed Dec 06, 2006 at 12:59:58 PM EST&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last year, we could throw wrenches into the works and call it a victory.  This year, we&#039;re going to try to govern, and this means that we actually have to accomplish stuff.  And based on what I&#039;m seeing on the net neutrality front, the progressive movement has a lot of work to do.  Take net neutrality for instance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/6">Astroturf / Front Group</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:15:29 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TX: In defense of local control</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/561</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/12/5/5williams_edit.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Austin American Statesman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COMMENTARY&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Williams: In defense of local control&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chad Williams, AUSTIN COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, December 05, 2006&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After 22 consecutive years of telecommunications deregulation, the law that ensures consumer protection and local control is in jeopardy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/37">TEXAS</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:04:15 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Black Legislators Back Light Regulatory Touch</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/559</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This week&#039;s astroturf candidate: The National Black Caucus of State Legislators&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6397438.html?display=Breaking+News&quot; target+&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Broadcasting &amp;amp; Cable &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Black Legislators Back Light Regulatory Touch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting &amp;amp; Cable, 12/5/2006&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With prospects dimming for national video franchise reform legislation anytime soon, the battle over the issue of network neutrality continues on the state level.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:05:04 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Congress likely to hang up on ’06 telecom</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/556</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journalgazette/business/16155182.htm&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; LA Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Congress likely to hang up on ’06 telecom reform&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Jim Puzzanghera&lt;br /&gt;
Los Angeles Times&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON – Big phone companies trying to dial in an overhaul of telecommunications laws will have to hang up and try the call again next year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Democratic takeover of Congress makes it increasingly unlikely that AT&amp;amp;T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. will be able to push through stalled legislation to make it easier for them to sell pay television.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/3">HR.5252 COPE</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:05:55 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SANTA AND SONS and daughter! continues Million Elf March on Public Access TV</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/546</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/11/prweb483469.htm&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; PR Web&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SANTA AND SONS &amp;amp; daughter! continues Million Elf March on Public Access TV for Second Year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Christmas movie musical &quot;SANTA AND SONS &amp;amp; daughter!&quot; reprises its Public Access Television awareness campaign with holiday showings of the rockin&#039; Santa family in over one hundred cities across the US and internationally.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:59:47 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Phone firms&#039; TV market bid may skip Congress</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/544</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-telecom28nov28,1,4646484.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-business&amp;amp;ctrack=1&amp;amp;cset=true&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; LA Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Phone firms&#039; TV market bid may skip Congress&lt;br /&gt;
With Democrats rising, an overhaul of telecom laws is unlikely. The industry turns to states.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Jim Puzzanghera, Times Staff Writer&lt;br /&gt;
November 28, 2006&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON — Big phone companies trying to dial in an overhaul of telecommunications laws will have to hang up and try the call again next year.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:28:35 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DeMint Pessimistic On Chances For Market-Based Telecom Reform</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/528</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-SZZK1163597343012.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Technology Daily&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sen. DeMint Pessimistic On Chances For Market-Based Telecom Reform&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Andrew Noyes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Tuesday, November 14) Chances for market-based communications reform in the Democratic-controlled Congress that convenes in January are &quot;slim to none,&quot; Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/7">Senate S.2686</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:12:57 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
