Latest NewsUser login |
saveaccess's blogNATOA Call to Action on Stevens Senate bill HR. 5252Posted on September 13, 2006 - 9:42pm.
From NATOA While the rumor mill is rampant that there’s just not enough time for the Senate to act on telecom reform this session (and we agree, that there is insufficient time to give telecom reform the type of consideration it needs), we never the less need to be vigilant. Senator Stevens is still working hard to lock in the necessary 60 votes to close debate (cloture) and the 60 votes necessary to overcome objections due to an unfunded mandate point of order. These are the only things holding him back – and we are working hard to keep him from obtaining those critical votes. ( categories: Senate S.2686 )
FCC Ignores America's Broadband WoesPosted on September 13, 2006 - 9:40pm.
from Free Press Sept.12, 2006 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FCC Ignores America's Broadband Woes New Report Shows U.S. Falling Behind Rest of World in High-Speed Internet Access, as Digital Divide Persists at Home Misleading FCC Data Masks Slow Speeds, High Prices and No Competition for Broadband Service WASHINGTON -- The United States continues to lag behind the rest of the world in accessible and affordable broadband service, with no signs of closing the digital divide at home, according to a new report released today by Free Press, the Consumer Federation of America and Consumers Union. ( categories: FCC )
California Cities Seek A Veto for Video BillPosted on September 13, 2006 - 9:38pm.
From: MultiChannel News California Cities Seek A Veto for Video Bill By Linda Haugsted California cities and counties, concerned that a new statewide video-franchising bill will disenfranchise groups of consumers throughout the state, have launched an effort to get Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to veto The municipalities and their advocacy group, the League of California Cities, strongly opposed the bill throughout the hearing process. Local regulators stressed their support for competition, but said they fear the bill (approved Aug. 31) will allow new providers, including telcos Verizon Communications Inc. and AT&T Inc., to geographically “cherry-pick” the state. ( categories: CALIFORNIA | State Franchises )
Local Government Position on Telecom TaxesPosted on September 13, 2006 - 9:29pm.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAXES Read complete NATOA PDF here The telecommunications industry is conducting a multipronged effort to reduce the level of taxes it pays to local governments. Large sums of money are being poured into national and local advertising in a highly targeted media and lobbying campaign. In addition, the telecommunications industry is litigating against local governments to contest taxes and fees. The industry is also lobbying the federal and state governments to obtain favorable legislation to accomplish the same result. ( categories: Senate S.2686 )
Letter from Rep. Tammy BaldwinPosted on September 13, 2006 - 9:26pm.
September 7, 2006 Dear Colleague: I would like to draw your attention to the attached Reuters article explaining how U.S. state and local governments could lose $8 billion a year in revenue under the national cable franchise reform bill currently being considered by the Senate. According to a study released yesterday by a coalition of local government organizations, the Senate bill would preempt and greatly impede local government's taxing authority, leading to billions of dollars in annual loses and forcing such government entities to either cut critical services or raise taxes. The full study could be found at http://www.nlc.org/content/Files/LocalGovtPerspective090606.pdf. ( categories: Senate S.2686 )
Net neutrality bill may die this yearPosted on September 13, 2006 - 9:22pm.
from: CNET News Net neutrality bill may die this year By Anne Broache Story last modified Wed Sep 13 06:16:40 PDT 2006 WASHINGTON--A rift over Net neutrality is the No. 1 issue holding up a massive communications bill and could cause it to be derailed this year, the chairman of a key U.S. Senate panel said Tuesday. ( categories: Senate S.2686 )
Triple Threat (NJ - NYC area)Posted on September 13, 2006 - 9:12pm.
Note: Here in the NYC area where Verizon has negotiated local franchises and a state franchise in NJ, the company has been advertising their triple play package for $95, a whopping $5 dollar savings over the same offering from cable companies. We guess this is the extent of what can be expected from 'more competition' and 'consumer choice'. We hope the state legislators in New Jersey will be able to explain how their vast public interest give-away was worth such meager 'consumer savings'. State legislators in NY should take notice - instead of 'triple play' they should be demanding 'fair play'. Progressives out of touch on public access televisionPosted on September 13, 2006 - 9:09pm.
from: Madison Capital Times Progressives out of touch on public access television I was at the Fighting Bob Fest kickoff benefit Friday night at the Barrymore Theatre. The theme was "Hold the Media Accountable." In the best progressive tradition, one speaker after another rose to talk about the failures of the concentrated corporate media industry, from local broadcast stations that use corporate video press releases and pass them off as objective news segments to the abysmal way American media fell into lock step with the drums of war. ( categories: )
Telecom Bill May Be DisconnectedPosted on September 5, 2006 - 9:22pm.
from: Media Week Telecom Bill May Be Disconnected Todd Shields SEPTEMBER 04, 2006 - Lawmakers returning to Washington this week will be greeted by telephone company lobbyists engaged in a final, uphill push for help in emerging as cable’s competitors. Verizon and AT&T want final passage of a bill that would let federal officials rather than localities set guidelines for offering video services. Telephone executives say kowtowing to thousands of localities is a barrier to rolling out TV services that offer hundreds of channels over high-speed lines. Cities and counties are fighting the measure, saying it saps their power to protect constituents and rights-of-way. ( categories: Senate S.2686 )
Is AT$T’s Current Project Lightspeed Actually Project SlightspeedPosted on September 5, 2006 - 7:45am.
Note: This is a somewhat technical discussion of AT&T's new data/video service and whether it will really be capable of providing adequate service into the future. An important consideration since Federal Communications Policy is being re-written to accomodate what may be an inferior technical implementation. from: CableTV.com ( categories: AT&T )
|